May 17, 2012

Hunger in America: How bad does 'bad' have to get before we change our language?

On November 16, the US Department of Agriculture reported that 49 million people in 2008 “lacked access to adequate nutrition.” That’s 13 million more people than in the previous year, and the most ever since the US began reporting this data 14 years ago. 

As we recover from the Thanksgiving holiday, is there anything else for us to think about as a people?

Let’s start with these grim facts. Before the Great Recession of 2008-09 hit:

  • The US lost 30 million good-paying jobs
  • 47 million people were uninsured
  • The US was spending 17% of GDP on health care, while ranked at the bottom among industrial nations for outcomes for patients of the delivery of that enormous expenditure
  • The nation’s infrastructure was in need of more than $1 trillion in overdue repairs to roads, bridges, rails and ports
  • Most states were headed toward life-threatening deficits
  • Two thirds of families who are defined as “food insecure” contained one or more full-time worker!

All this accumulated pain in the heart and soul of American society. Then, to make matters much worse, the Great Recession of 2008-09 hit. The pain that has accumulated steadily over the last 30 years is broad and deep. A serious lack of leadership in this period is responsible for a society that now leaves its people vulnerable and insecure.

And we now learn that along with nearly 20% unemployment last week -- that’s right, the official 10.2% figure was correctly interpreted by The New York Times last week as at least 17.5% if we include people who have stopped looking for work and those who are involuntarily working part-time—more people are hungry than at any time since hunger statistics have been recorded. And the hunger is among those who have jobs!!

What to do? 

Among other things, we must change our language. We must STOP saying that “things will get better when the economy improves”. This language is designed to make us think that an economic “upturn” (as people like to call such things) will make things better.

Since 1975, when the unrelenting slide for working people began, there have been several “upturns” and “downturns” in the shopworn economic indicators that are watched mostly by Wall Street, large investors and major corporations.

Until we change our language to demand real security for all people in our society, we will not create the will to begin to create public policy and private investment that will take us there.

If we want change, the first thing we need is to be relentless with a new language. 

Next year, more will be hungry. Time’s up!

 

Comments

Indeed economic recession has affected nutrition

Indeed economic recession has affected how people tighten up their budget affecting nutrition. Also, Since the job market took such a dump in the recession, a lot of people have had to try freelancing in the absence of a 9 to 5 job.  There isn't anything wrong with it, and it isn't a bad way to make a little on the side, but being able to provide more than a supplementary income is difficult. There are also other risks, such as taxes not being automatically withheld, and making sure all agreements are in place and above board. You might have to hire a lawyer to get all the paperwork in order, and that can take a couple of payday loans if you don't have the cash or credit to hire an attorney outright. 

Changing our language

John, this posting opens multiple thoughts.

On a personal level, we must look honestly at what is happening in our society, and plan accordingly. "Giving back" may or may not be a phrase that has less meaning because of overuse, but many of us who read this have the ability to help those who are not as privileged in one way or another (and many do!).

On a societal level, we need to see through the rhetoric used by the forces responsible for the stratification of wealth, and inform others. When we hear the pundits advocating against reform with phrases like "government control of health care", or "death tax", we need to find a forum to raise a mirror to the rhetoric and falsehoods.

Equally important, we need to understand the thinking and concerns of the less fortunate people who make decisions based on the sound bites. I urge people to read "Deer Hunting With Jesus", by Joe Bageant. It's an entertaining yet informative study of working class people whose political views lean to the right. Many of us might say that they "vote against their interests", but have not heard their reasons for doing so. The book raises more questions than answers, and provides a good starting point in an important conversation.

That's enough for now. I'll stay tuned for further messages (keep 'em coming!). Thanks, John.

    

Dear sfoiws, Thank you or

Dear sfoiws,

Thank you or your insights and recommendations. I'd like to hear more from you about your approach and experiences with changing our language, opening up conversation, or as some of my mentors have taught me, to work at "acting our way into new ways of thinking".

Take care,

 

John

JOHN AUGUST
Executive director, Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions

Bio
To say that John is passionate about social justice is an understatement.
READ MORE »